Best, Bottoms, Switches: One Finally Consider Most Of The Survey Data | Autostraddle

Hi and welcome to our final quest to the annals of data gathered by me personally, from you, about your feelings concerning sexual terms leading / bottom / change. We have now currently discussed:

Today we’re going to go through the survey responses in general, and just how several other identities, methods, lifestyle scenarios and connections intersect utilizing the identities I made the decision to truly actually demolish over the last few months.

Just a Reminder

One last time with experience, this is how the numbers shook away:

Best: 12per cent // Bottom: 14.3percent // Switch: 51.6percent // None of preceding; 13.4percent // I am not sure: 8.9per cent

Looking at The Information

Gender Functions

We’ve divided rise in popularity of different intercourse functions by sexual identification in previous articles. Here is what the entire party is actually into:

Notably, despite there becoming a little a lot more soles than surfaces inside our team, y’all like to give circumstances more than accept them virtually across-the-board — unless it involves getting the mouth area or thumb in somebody’s asshole, at which point you’d rather have somebody take action for you than do so to someone! Interesting.

Intimate Volume

Survey-takers were asked “within previous half a year, how frequently perhaps you have, typically, had gender?” This is why that ended up:

When it comes to “Other/Complicated” choice, survey-takers had been required to explain their own scenario. I had those and pulled most of the ones that were about long-distance connections making that into unique group, plus pulled responses that did add a definite way of measuring intimate regularity and included those to their particular classes. Just before doing so, around 10per cent of participants selected Other/Complicated, frequently because they thought simply choosing one of several provided answers didn’t inform your whole story. Regardless of cross country folks describing durations of daily intercourse alternating by times of no intercourse, the most widespread scenarios discussed right here happened to be folks in uncharacteristic dried out spells due to surgery, ailment, depression or taking anti-depressants.

There seemed to beno significant relationship between top/bottom/switch recognition as well as how usually you’ve got sex. Actually, in addition to staying in a relationship or not, perhaps not a lot affected how often you reported making love in a statistically significant way. Although
the majority of studies have shown opposite-sex partners have intercourse more often than same-sex feminine partners
, the queers on our survey who have been internet dating males had been making love at nearly identical costs as those matchmaking ladies.

Additionally keeping actually pace with one another? Those in monogamous and non-monogamous relationships, in-line
using the outcomes of our very own 2015 Lesbian Sex study
. We cannot truly evaluate both surveys since they were two separate self-selected trials, nevertheless was actually interesting that 2018 party was hoping


having way less gender in general compared to 2015 group. Most likely caused by existential fear!

Sexual Knowledge and Positioning

Tops tended to have acquired more lifetime intimate partners compared to additional groups. 19% of tops have actually ridden the hobby horse with over ten women and 8% with over 20, when compared to 9percent and 3per cent for soles and 16percent and 5% for switches.

Tops were additionally the lowest likely to experienced sex with men — 43% have not, compared to 37percent of soles and 33per cent of changes.

Sexual Orientation

Listed here is the fundamental breakdown of the class by intimate positioning:

Some noted correlations:

  • 65per cent of Pansexuals identify as switches, compared to 51per cent for the whole party and 50per cent of lesbians and bisexuals.
  • 51.5% of covers determine as lesbians, in comparison to 44per cent of bottoms and 42percent of switches.
  • 19% of bisexuals identify as bottoms, when compared with 14% in the entire team.
  • 15% of lesbians and 18percent of homosexual folks identified as clothes, compared to 8.6percent of bisexuals, 7% of pansexuals, 11per cent of queers and 12per cent of the entire class.

Gender Personality and Presentation

Discover just how y’all experience your own sex nowadays:

talked about within our post on tops
, the survey announced that the “masculine partner = leading” and “feminine spouse = bottom” stereotype (which was, back in the day, a total directive) provides extensive fact to it, however it positively can’t be used across-the-board.

Around 8% of these which recognized as large femme or hard femme defined as clothes, in comparison to 12% from the whole class. Around 8per cent of gentle butches and masculine-of-center people identified as soles, compared to 14% of all survey-takers.

“Switch” was, naturally, the most common identification for many teams, with between 50 and sixty percent aligning by themselves with switchiness — really the only sex demonstration with under 50 per cent getting switch-aligned was butches, which only skipped the mark at 49%. Tomboy femmes practically tipped the scale from inside the other direction but not quite — 59% are susceptible to switching it up. But, as discussed from the surfaces blog post, it’s never secure to think just what a person’s into based on their own sex demonstration.

Numerous butches and femmes quoted into the clothes post conveyed stress they had been believed to get a premier or bottom because of the gender presentation.

We additionally discovered some variances within sex identification and trans condition also — like that trans females happened to be the most likely to spot as bottoms. Non-binary/genderqueer guys were probably to identify as surfaces, but our trial size for the group (16) ended up being too small to draw any significant results.

In addition seems that non-binary/genderqueer ladies had been most likely to recognize as switches, and agender folks happened to be almost certainly to “not be very positive.” Perhaps there is certainly a complete correlation between being changes and pinpointing with language that some might start thinking about oxymoronic, like “tomboy femme” and “non-binary lady.”

Geography – Global

69percent of review participants originated the U.S. and 31% had been outside of the U.S.. There were a little even more Europeans identifying as “none in the above” (17.6percent, compared to 13percent of individuals inside U.S. and 11per cent of Canadians). “I reside in Europe, function in French (and Dutch), and also for some explanation “top”, “bottom” and “change” listed here are mainly used on sexual experiences between two male-identified folks,” had written one European, although getting reasonable, a lot of People in america met with the same impact.

“Really don’t want to utilize classes,” published another. “In my opinion the tense and excludes possiblity to enjoy without generating an entire big deal out of it and panders to stockbuilding (as happens with categories of identification). But i know it seems to be quite anything into the US.”

We merely had 109 survey-takers in Australia, in case that group is representative I then would want to offer a tip associated with the cap to the land down under as well as my friends and household just who reside truth be told there, you really have evaded the so-called leading scarcity afflicting this country with an amazing 16.5% covers / 5.5% bottoms proportion.

Asia and Canada had similar numbers of people distinguishing with your terms given that U.S., and then we did not have adequate respondents in South America, Africa or Mexico to-draw significant results.

Geography – U.S.

83% of survey participants lived-in an urban area or significant metro location and 17.25per cent in rural places. We offered U.S. residents the option of showing when they lived in nine specific cities/metro locations, or otherwise they were able to say “I do perhaps not are now living in some of these metropolises or metro areas, but I do are now living in a city/major metro place” or “i actually do maybe not inhabit an urban area or metro place.”

Plenty of commenters chimed into point out the nine towns and cities we incorporated weren’t the largest locations contained in this country or the a lot of LGBT-populated urban centers. This will be positively proper. When you look at the interest of complete disclosure: we now have an author undertaking a piece about one of those nine towns therefore planned to collect data about that area especially, nevertheless felt weird to only inquire about one town, therefore we threw in eight others just about off of the surfaces in our heads: nyc, San Francisco/Bay Area, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Boston, Minneapolis/St.Paul, Portland and Seattle.

Just 21 respondents were from Atlanta, an example size too tiny for evaluation. So we’re looking at those eight locations along with other unlabeled city-dwellers (which I added Atlanta men and women to) and non-city people. To Help You organize your grains of salt correctly, here you will find the wide range of answers I had from each town: Portland, otherwise – 63, L . A . – 96, New York – 212, Chicago – 85, Seattle – 91, San Francisco/Bay Neighborhood – 124, Minneapolis/St.Paul – 53, Boston – 101.

This information ended up being pretty interesting now If only we’d asked about a lot more cities! For all the purposes of this analysis,

We cut right out the “I’m not sure” classification

, because SurveyMonkey mentioned we did not have enough men and women choosing that option for mathematically considerable outcomes.

To examine city-specific information on the general data, next, the entire figures for your group because of the “I’m Not Sure”s eliminated tend to be: Top (14%), Bottom (15per cent), Switch (56.6per cent), None on the Above (14.5percent)

  • Highest percentage of surfaces:

    Los Angeles (22%), ny (17.4%), non-city/metro-areas (16.2percent).

  • Best portion of surfaces:

    San Francisco/Bay Region (7per cent), Boston (9.7%), Portland (10.2per cent)

Regarding the surfaces for the non-city/metro places, a “top shortage” concept we published down within my laptop was “EVERY BEST ARE LOCATED IN THE WOODS / REGARDING FARM?” However you understand where otherwise the tops tend to be? From the 405 or trying to get a seat about L practice at the Bedford end during rush-hour.

  • Finest portion of soles:

    Minneapolis/St.Paul (24per cent), Boston (19per cent), L . A . (17.4percent)

  • Cheapest portion of soles:

    San Francisco/Bay Region (12.4per cent), Ny (13.3per cent), Portland (13.6percent)

It seems the soles are in the 405 and a number of are now being useful service-oriented neighbors to their other Midwesterners.

  • Finest percentage of switches:

    Portland (66per cent), San Francisco/Bay Area (60percent), Seattle (55.6per cent)

Portland is DTF, y’all, and happy to switch it so that you can fit the bill!

  • Highest portion of “not one regarding the Above”:

    San Francisco/Bay Neighborhood (19.3per cent), Minneapolis/St.Paul (19.15%), Chicago (17percent)

The individuals of san francisco bay area want to blaze their very own damn tracks.

How about kink?

  • Cities with kink-identified folks:

    San Francisco/Bay Neighborhood (29.5per cent), Minneapolis (25.5%), L. A. (25.5per cent)

  • Cities with the most people who find themselves either kinky


    down for perverted intercourse:

    Seattle (87per cent), Minneapolis (83percent), Portland (80percent)

If absolutely any such thing specific you’re curious about regarding the information I built-up or the open-answer questions we requested, inform me from inside the statements and if feasible, i could address them in a future post!

Before you go!

It costs cash which will make indie queer media, and frankly, we are in need of even more people to thrive 2023

As thanks for LITERALLY maintaining all of us alive, A+ people obtain access to added bonus material, additional Saturday puzzles, and more!

Will you join?

Terminate at any time.

Join A+!



About Redefined

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Recent Posts